Australian Competition and Consumer Commission on Digital Platforms

Dec 12, 2018 | Srivats Shankar

The ACCC explored the implications of digital platform with reference to market power, consumer influence, and the potential of AI on these platforms

On December 10, 2018 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission released a report on its enquiry with reference to digital platforms. The commission explored the implications of the work developed by digital platforms with reference to search engines, social media platforms, and digital content aggregation platforms. Setting this out the scope of their analysis the commission noted the extensive power that was vested with these digital platforms. As noted within the report, almost half of all revenue generated from advertisements comes from the major digital platforms – including Google and Facebook – within Australia. This gives an enormous market power when it comes to directing and influencing consumer preferences.

The access and ability to leverage this platform for advertisement was one of the biggest concerns of the ACCC. They took particular concern with the spread of disinformation, a clear reference to the growing concern of “fake news” around the world. They analysed the rules of the platforms in responsibly reflecting and disseminating information. However, they noted that due to the sector-specific nature of regulations regulating platforms that spread information, currently within the Australian jurisdiction over very few regulations that are applicable directly on digital platforms. This created a regulatory hurdle for regulating content on these patterns. Additionally, with the difficulties related to “take-down” requests the ECC took concern with how useful it really was to regulate these platforms due to their reach and instant access to the end consumer.

This coupled with the difficulties in raising awareness on the usage of user data, especially concerns expressed by users themselves created an additional hurdle. The shortcomings of the existing privacy policies furthered this avenue, although the ACC focused more on implications as end consumers rather than the implications of privacy as a fundamental notion within itself.

Interestingly, rather than focusing on artificial intelligence as a major matter for concern, they saw it as a tool for reducing disinformation and distribution of false news. However, they did note the potential for “AI bias” which develops as a result of incorrect and misapplication of information in the development of AI. They also saw the usage of chatbots as a tool that could potentially imitate human interaction and lead to fraudulent social and economic activities. The ACCC recommended that legislative action needs to be taken with reference to monitoring and regulating the technology, so that the implementation can have beneficial effects for consumers rather than a detrimental impact.

Related

Latest

European Union Considering Establishing International Treaty on Artificial Intelligence

Srivats Shankar | Jul 26, 2020

The European Union Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence is considering an international treaty for artificial intelligence in its upcoming session

Department of Transportation Releases Document for Future of Transportation Regulatory Approach

Srivats Shankar | Jul 26, 2020

The US Department of Transportation releases document for facilitating communication between regulators and developers of emerging transportation technology

Amica: Australia’s Solution for Dividing Assets

Srivats Shankar | Jul 23, 2020

Read On

Terminology

Deepfake

/diːpfeɪk/

Artificial General Intelligence

/ˌɑːtɪfɪʃl ˈdʒɛn(ə)r(ə)l ɪnˈtelɪɡəns/

Artificial Intelligence

/ˌɑːtɪfɪʃl ɪnˈtelɪɡəns/

More Terminology

Events

13th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence – ICAART 2021

INSTICC | 2021-02-04 12:00:00

More Events