Safeguarding Human Rights in the Age of AI: Recommendations of the Council of Europe
Jun 10, 2019 | Srivats Shankar
In a report by the Commissioner for Human Rights in the EU, recommendations have been considered with regard to how human rights can be protected with regard to AI
The Council of Europe released an exhaustive report on the safeguard
of human rights with regard to AI. They provide 10 recommendations that are
to be implemented by multiple stakeholders to ensure that there are no
compromises with human rights as the growth in the field of AI begins to result
in real-world. According to the report, although the discussion is aimed
towards the member states of the EU, they state that any entity that directly
or indirectly has an impact on the development, implementation and effect of AI
should consult these recommendations.
The 10 recommendations are as follows:
- human rights impact assessment
- public consultations
- obligations of member states to facilitate the
implementation of human rights standards in the private sector
- information transparency
- independent oversight
- non-discrimination and transparency
- data protection and privacy
- freedom of expression, assembly and association,
and the right to work
- remedies
- promotion of “AI literacy”
The specifics of each of these recommendations are fairly
exhaustive. For example, the human rights impact assessments are to be
conducted by public authorities on systems that they acquire. They even
recommend for external audits. Interestingly, with regard to the obligation of
member states to facilitate the implementation of human rights standards in the
private sector, they recommend reference to the UN Guiding Principles on
Business and Human Rights to ensure that there is a non-discriminatory manner
of implementation of AI by different actors. These requirements coupled with
the requirement of independent regulatory measures and education in the field
of AI go a long way in furthering the goals of the EU to maintain
accountability and transparency in the instrumentation of AI, while at the same
time remaining leaders in the field of AI.
It would be interesting to see if any of these guidelines
are implemented in order to regulate AI through a legislative mandate.